Search for: "SANOFI-SYNTHELABO V. APOTEX, INC. " Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 42. [3] See Sections 27(3)(b) and 28.3 of the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4 [4] Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc v Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd, [1976] 1 SCR 555 at 563 [5] Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc, 2008 SCC 61 at paragraph 37, [2008] 3 SCR 265; see also Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v Eurocopter, société par actions simplifiée, 2013… [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
In that decision (Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- In an appeal decided last month, the Federal Circuit reversed a decision by the District Court for the Southern District of New York awarding prejudgment interest to Plaintiffs-Appellees Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc., and Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership ("Sanofi"); affirmed the District Court's denial of a motion for leave to file a supplemental answer, affirmative… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:45 pm
" Ecolab, 569 F.3d at 1352 (quoting Sanofi-Synthelabo v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:00 pm
Sanofi-Synthelabo v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:29 pm
" Sanofi-Synthelabo v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:47 am by Sheppard Mullin
The defendants in both sets of actions were Sanofi Aventis and Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership (collectively “Sanofi”) and Apotex Corporation (“Apotex”). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am by Stefanie Levine
Michael Davitz, Partner at Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider and  Practice Center Contributor, recently sent in this article he wrote with colleague’s Drew Schulte and Jia Li discussing the Patent Prosecution Highway and the value that can be achieved for those practitioners willing to explore the new program. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
Barr Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan Pharma (Patent Docs) (Patently-O) Omnicef (Cefdinir) – US: CAFC on whether a product-by-process claim is infringed by an identical product made by different process: Abbott Labs v Sandoz (IP Frontline) Pertussis vaccines – UK: EWHC dismisses Medeva appeal against pertussis vaccines SPCs refusal (The SPC Blog) Plavix (Clopidogrel) – Canada: Adding some obvious flexibility: Apotex Inc v… [read post]