Search for: "SCHOOL DIST. NO. 78 v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 51" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 12:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
School Dist. v Arlington Teachers Assn., 78 NY2d 33, the court explained that an arbitration award determining an employment dispute in public education may not be vacated unless "it violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Prior to the events described in this appeal, petitioner provided direct instruction in mathematics at respondent’s Junior-Senior High School (“high school”). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Prior to the events described in this appeal, petitioner provided direct instruction in mathematics at respondent’s Junior-Senior High School (“high school”). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Prior to the events described in this appeal, petitioner provided direct instruction in mathematics at respondent’s Junior-Senior High School (“high school”). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Prior to the events described in this appeal, petitioner provided direct instruction in mathematics at respondent’s Junior-Senior High School (“high school”). [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
”The court cited Dietz v Board of Educ. of Rochester City School Dist., 98 AD3d 1251 in which it was held “… the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the District and the union representing petitioner provided that layoffs of ‘school instructors’ would be affected within the four separate categories of school instructors identified in the CBA rather than within tenure areas; that separate seniority lists for… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
”The court cited Dietz v Board of Educ. of Rochester City School Dist., 98 AD3d 1251 in which it was held “… the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the District and the union representing petitioner provided that layoffs of ‘school instructors’ would be affected within the four separate categories of school instructors identified in the CBA rather than within tenure areas; that separate seniority lists for… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
”The court cited Dietz v Board of Educ. of Rochester City School Dist., 98 AD3d 1251 in which it was held “… the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the District and the union representing petitioner provided that layoffs of ‘school instructors’ would be affected within the four separate categories of school instructors identified in the CBA rather than within tenure areas; that separate seniority lists for… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
”The court cited Dietz v Board of Educ. of Rochester City School Dist., 98 AD3d 1251 in which it was held “… the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the District and the union representing petitioner provided that layoffs of ‘school instructors’ would be affected within the four separate categories of school instructors identified in the CBA rather than within tenure areas; that separate seniority lists for… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
(3) Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the second degree if serious bodily injury results from the defendant operating the auto or vessel while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) while: (a) on any school property used for school purposes which is owned by or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board, or within 1,000 feet of such school property; (b) driving through a school… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In denying plaintiff's motion, the court determined that a reasonable jury could have concluded that Miller's "mistake and the shooting that resulted" did not violate any applicable standard of care and hinged on a credibility determination best left for the jury (US Dist Ct, ND NY, 3:13 CV 107, Sept. 27, 2017, McAvoy, Sr. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In denying plaintiff's motion, the court determined that a reasonable jury could have concluded that Miller's "mistake and the shooting that resulted" did not violate any applicable standard of care and hinged on a credibility determination best left for the jury (US Dist Ct, ND NY, 3:13 CV 107, Sept. 27, 2017, McAvoy, Sr. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
The following are a few of such endorsements: Philip Enterline, “Attributability in the Face of Uncertainty,” 78 (Supp.) [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Brown, 389 So. 2d 48, 51 (La. 1980) (concluding drug possession cannot be a strict liability crime because it would impermissibly criminalize unknowing possession of a controlled substance and permit a person to be convicted “without ever being aware of the nature of the substance he was given. [read post]