Search for: "SOLVAY V HONEYWELL" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2020, 9:16 pm by Rik Lambers (Brinkhof)
The road from the EU Court of Justice’s GAT/LUK to Solvay/Honeywell will be sufficiently familiar to most of the readers. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:23 am by Dominic Adair
Any doubt on this issue is resolved by the CJEU decision in Solvay v Honeywell which provides a clear analogy. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:55 am by Brian Cordery
The Judge (Arnold J) applied the reasoning of the CJEU in GAT v LuK and Solvay v Honeywell, holding that the claim advanced by the patentee was “concerned with” the validity of the German patent for the purposes of Article 24(4) of the Recast Brussels I Regulation, or at least “principally concerned with” that validity under Article 27 of the Regulation, and therefore the English court had no jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:54 pm
As a vocal objector to tentacles ::shudder::, the AmeriKat is pleased that the English court's long arm is cut short by Recast Brussels I Regulation ...Following a review of relevant case law (including GAT v LuK  and Solvay v Honeywell), Arnold J concluded that Rhodia's claim fell under article 24(4), or was at least "principally concerned with" the validity of the German designation of the patent under Article 27. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 3:12 pm by Gene Quinn
On February 12, 2014, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Solvay S.A. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
Similarly, in C-616/10 Solvay v Honeywell [2012] ECR I-0000 the CJEU supported the Dutch courts' willingness to grant preliminary injunctions to prevent the infringement of foreign patents. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
The recent judgment of the CJEU in Case C‑616/10, Solvay SA v Honeywell et al. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:55 pm by WIMS
The problem for Honeywell here is that this Court concluded in Arkema Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:05 am by Gilles Cuniberti
The European Court of Justice (Third Chamber) delivered its judgment in Solvay v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:52 am
616/10 Solvay SA v Honeywell Fluorine Products Europe BV, Honeywell Belgium NV and Honeywell Europe NV, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank ‘s-Gravenhage (Netherlands), shows an impressive turn of pace for the Court of Justice. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:29 pm
The Kat reviews the Opinion of the Advocate General in Case C 616/10 Solvay SA v Honeywell Fluorine Products Europe BV, Honeywell Belgium NV and Honeywell Europe NV. * "IBIL seminar report: where are the leaders in copyright law? [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:28 am
After Honeywell lodged its defence, Solvay realized that in fact the defence (according to Solvay) could be read as an acknowledgement by Honeywell that they infringed version (A) of the EP. [read post]