Search for: "STATE v. SHAFFER" Results 41 - 60 of 167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action for violations of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Ehrenkranz v 58 MHR, LLC, 159 AD3d 872, 872; Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 636; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759). [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 1:42 am
Helfer & Mikael Rask Madsen, International Court Authority in Question: Introduction to Part III Andrei Marmor, Authority of International Courts: Scope, Power and Legitimacy Michael Zürn, International Courts: Command v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 10:22 am
Gregory Shaffer (Univ. of California, Irvine - Law) has posted Retooling Trade Agreements for Social Inclusion (University of Illinois Law Review, forthcoming). [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:11 am by Brandon C. Meadows, Esq.
Compensation is due when the condemning authority exceeds the scope of rights afforded by an existing easement Florida State Turnpike Authority v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 6:11 am
The Maryland legislature never enacted a “director consent” statute which is necessary to provide prospective directors notice sufficient enough to satisfy the Due Process Clause in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Shaffer v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]