Search for: "Samples v. Samples" Results 21 - 40 of 6,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
‚¬ The resulting case,Grand Upright Music Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 6:10 am
In 2005, in the case of Bridgeport Music v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 9:59 am by Shaunna Mireau
Shoker. and the related Response to the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:05 am by John L. Welch
The TTABlog focuses primarily on final decisions, but here is a sampling of recent rulings on assorted interlocutory motions.Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 3:29 pm by Colette Ghazarian and Kit Walsh
” Notably, this decision directly contradicts an earlier ruling by the Sixth Circuit in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 6:39 pm
Supreme Court (Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm by Lawrence Solum
Sample (Hofstra School of Law) has posted Lawyer, Candidate, Beneficiary, and Judge? [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 2:31 am
TufAmerica Inc v W B Music Corp 13-cv-7847(LAK), heard by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, had to decide whether Jay Z’s alleged sampling and use of the syllable “oh” in an audio recording and music video entitled Run This Town  amounted to copyright infringement. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
A sample does not replace the original work, but creates a new independent work. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
A sample does not replace the original work, but creates a new independent work. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
With respect to sampling sound recordings, the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]