Search for: "Samsung Semiconductor Inc"
Results 41 - 60
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 1:46 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Samsung International, Inc. of San Diego, California Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas Apple, Inc.… [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:13 pm
The Commission has identified the following as respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California ASUStek Computer, Inc. of Taiwan ASUS Computer International of Fremont,… [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:56 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:17 pm
Lastly, the complaint states that Renesas once asserted a patent related to the ‘432 patent against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in the U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 pm
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”), Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 8:32 am
., Futurewei Technologies,Inc., Huawei Device Co., Ltd., Huawei DeviceUSA Inc., Huawei Technologies USA Inc., ZTE Corp., ZTEUSA, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., SamsungElectronics America, Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., LG ElectronicsU.S.A., Inc., Nintendo Co., Ltd., and Nintendo ofAmerica Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:35 am
Samsung came in second with 4,551 patent (+26%) Microsoft is third with 3,094 (+6.5%). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is OSRAM GmbH (“OSRAM”) and the Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung LED Co., Ltd., and Samsung LED America, Inc. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:55 am
Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Apple, Inc., Nokia Corp., Nokia Inc., PNY Technologies, Inc., Research In Motion Ltd., Research in Motion Corporation, Transcend Information Inc., Transcend Information Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:11 pm
According to the Order, Complainants Spansion, Inc. and Spansion LLC (collectively, “Spansion”) moved to compel Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to produce certain documents, witnesses, information, and… [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:13 pm
The complaint alleges that chip manufacturers/distributors Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, Samsung International, Inc. of San Diego, California, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California, Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas (collectively “Samsung”), and downstream manufacturers/sellers… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:09 am
(“SLED”) filed a motion to compel Respondents OSRAM GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:23 am
Micron, together with Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd, Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., and Infineon Technologies of North America, controlled seventy-five percent of the worldwide market for these chips. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:27 am
No. 337-TA-634, where Sharp had alleged that Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
The defendants named in the action are: AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc.; Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Hitachi Displays, Ltd.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.; LG Display Co., Ltd.; LG Display America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; … [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:51 pm
According to the Order, on April 2, 2010, Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co., Ltd., Apple Inc., AsusTek Computer, Inc., Asus Computer International, Inc., Transcend Information, Inc., Transcend Information,… [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 12:23 pm
This settlement, a result of numerous actions brought by Rambus against Samsung and other chip manufacturers such as Hynix Semiconductor Inc and Micron Technology, came just before an antitrust trial was scheduled to begin against Samsung in San Francisco. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:29 pm
Ltd.2 POLYOLEFIN NANO-COMPOSITE a catalyst system comprising () a supported catalyst consisting of (at a polymer, (b) a silicate clay mineral, ...Semiconductor nano-rod devicesUS Pat. 6855606 - Filed February 20, 2003 - Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 4:59 pm
Ltd., Hitachi Ltd.; Chinese Academy of Sciences CAS, Canon Inc., Toshiba Corp., Midea Group Co. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:13 pm
(“Samsung”) and the remaining Respondents are Spansion, Inc. and Spansion LLC, (collectively, “Spansion”) and D-Link Corp. and D-Link Systems, Inc. [read post]
