Search for: "Searle v. Searle"
Results 41 - 60
of 212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2019, 10:43 am
A 1997 ruling by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in Searles v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:57 am
Searle v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 6:20 pm
Searle, (D. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:59 am
Searle LLC & anr, Court of Appeal of England and Wales, Civil Division, [2018] EWCA Civ 49, 25 January 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 7:58 am
Accordingly, it seems reasonable to interpret the Teva v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:48 am
What is not clear is the extent (if any) to which the AG had in mind the two other pending references***: Royalty Pharma’s application (C-650/17), which concerns an SPC for sitagliptin based upon a patent which did not individually disclose sitagliptin (indeed sitagliptin was developed after the priority date of the patent) and Sandoz v GD Searle ([2018] EWCA Civ 49) which concerns an SPC for darunavir based upon a patent which did not individually disclose darunavir but had… [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Power VenturesBlizzard v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Power VenturesBlizzard v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 10:05 pm
Searle LLC (2) Janssen Sciences Ireland UC [2017] EWHC 987 (Pat). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:29 pm
Searle LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:34 am
Bristol-Myers SquibbCo. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:25 pm
Searle & Co. (1984) 35 Cal.3d 691, 699-700.) [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
La American Bar Foundation, National Science Foundation y Searle Foundation enviaron equipos de asistentes de investigación a los centros de registros federales para codificar las características de una muestra aleatoria de casos de derechos civiles laborales presentados durante un período de 15 años: 1,788 casos en total. [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 2:13 pm
Andrew started with the year’s SPC cases (Abraxis, Teva v Gilead, Teva v Merck, Sandoz v GD Searle) before going on to the legal highlights: Actavis, AbbVie and Unwired Planet. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:06 pm
Philips v Asustek and HTCGuestKat Eibhlin Vardy cuts her patent litigation teeth on smartphones - She had a wave of nostalgia delving into the acronyms of mobile telecommunications standards in the recent Court of Appeal decision of Koninklijke Philips N.V. v Asustek Computer Incorporation, HTC Corporation and others [2017] EWCA Civ 1526. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
Fox v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
” – another excellent book review by IPKat's Nicola Searle. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
” – IPKat Nicola Searle reviews G.M. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 6:25 am
Maine v. [read post]
