Search for: "Shaub"
Results 101 - 120
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
Jonathan Shaub wrote that the D.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Benjamin Wittes, Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub and Scott R. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:33 am
Hosted by Benjamin Wittes, the panel included Anna Bower, Jonathan Shaub, and Natalie Orpett. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Jonathan Shaub discusses how previously disclosed Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memoranda cover the scope and nature of executive privilege as well as the question of how constitutional disagreement between Congress and the executive branch about privilege can and should be resolved. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:40 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast that featured a conversation between Quinta Jurecic, Roger Parloff and Jonathan David Shaub about the contempt prosecution of Steve Bannon. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Jonathan Shaub criticized the McGahn decision and argued that the court ignored the history of oversight and need for judicial review in its ruling. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
Jonathan Shaub proposed an understanding of executive privilege that, he argues, aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles than does much contemporary discussion of the subject. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 1:48 pm
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck sat down to discuss ongoing Mar-a-Lago document litigation, the House select committee’s subpoena of former President Donald Trump, the Biden Administration’s executive order on handling EU citizen data in the context of American intelligence gathering, and more: Jurecic sat down with Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub, and Wittes to discuss historical precedents for current and former presidents testifying before Congress and debated the… [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am
Jonathan Shaub delved into the Trump administration's new interpretation of executive privilege. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
Some of the common names are list below: Adams and Reese Akerman Senterfitt Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld Alston & Bird Archer & Greiner Arnall Golden Gregory Arnold & Porter Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz Ballard Spahr Bancroft Barnes & Thornburg Becker & Poliakoff Berger Singerman Best Best & Krieger Bingham McCutchen Boies, Schiller & Flexner Bracewell & Giuliani Braff, Harris & Sukoneck Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck Bryan Cave… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:04 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write: In discretionary matters, the Appellate Division's scope of review is co-extensive with that of the trial court, and it may exercise its discretion independently. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 12:34 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, examine a recent Second Circuit decision which discusses partial final judgments pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:33 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, discuss the rules governing the certification of questions of state law to the New York Court of Appeals from certain federal courts and other courts of last resort, an exception to the time-honored rule that the courts of New York do not issue advisory opinions. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:07 am
” “Revelations about the no-bid contract last week generated sharp criticism; Walter Shaub, a former top White House ethics official under President Barack Obama, suggested on Twitter they might reflect violations of the federal contracting procedures. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:44 am
One wonders why, though, Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt ever took on this case (i.e., one with minimal injuries and little prospect of proving fault on the defendants' part). [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:28 am
The confrontations have given Shaub, a self-effacing career bureaucrat, the reputation of a fighter. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
As Jonathan David Shaub ably explains, when taken in isolation, each response is accompanied by particularized constitutional justifications, and claim to respond to unusual positions taken by congressional committees as well. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:08 am
Ann Shaub. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:12 am
The Hatch Act Bars Meadows’ Removal Bid by Walter Shaub, Norman L. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:17 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, examine Estevez-Yalcin v. [read post]
