Search for: "Sheets v. Doe"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
The hearing officer found that Petitioner had submitted time sheets falsely stating that she had provided instruction to a disabled student and inaccurately indicated that she had reported to certain New York City Department of Education [DOE] schools and libraries over the two-month period in the aftermath of the impact of Hurricane Sandy on New York City and its surrounding area. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
The constitutionality of DSPE Act has been already upheld by the Supreme Court in Advance Insurance Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:29 am
See Schriber-Schroth Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:43 am
The CAFC case Hollmer v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:07 am
Sheet Metal Workers’ Nat’l Pension Fund, 134 F. [read post]
25 May 2019, 8:58 am
” [Jay Schweikert, Cato on Doe v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 11:44 pm
Brand v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm
Interestingly, however, the available data does not really bear that out industry-wide. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
Indeed, it's ample evidence he does.(4) Fake WD 40 can. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:16 am
In yesterday's advance sheets, the South Carolina Supreme Court issued its decision in Sapp v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:43 am
A method for manufacturing a high strength steel sheet, comprising the steps of: heating a steel sheet consisting of by mass %C: 0.10% to 0.73%,Si: 3.0% or less,Mn 0.5% to 3.0%,P: 0.1% or less,S: 0.07% or less,Al: 3.0% or less,N: 0.010% or less, andas remainder Fe and incidental impurities, and optionally at least one of the following elements:Cr: 0.05% to 5.0%,V: 0.005% to 1.0%,Mo: 0.005% to 0.5%,Ti: 0.01% to 0.1%,Nb: 0.01% to 0.1%,B: 0.0003% to 0.0050%,Ni: 0.05% to… [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:21 am
The Texas Supreme Court’s docket sheet does not yet provide details, but it does confirm that some filing has been made. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:50 am
While this order is without prejudice for the defendant to file such a motion, counsel is advised that merely finding a different, better or more detailed way to express a thought does not constitute “good cause” shown for the submission of amended pleadings or motions before this court. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:08 am
Here's the rules and a cheat sheet of major changes. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:50 pm
In the recent case of Freeway Properties Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:19 pm
De Santis and Iacobucci v Doublesee Enterprises Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:42 pm
, Asessment Techs v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:29 am
See Schriber-Schroth Co. v. [read post]
