Search for: "Simmons v. State Bar" Results 41 - 60 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents his fourth instalment [previously: here, here, here] of the Retromark trade mark litigation round up.This time around we have eight worthy UK and EU cases for you, including some big hitters in the form of Cartier, Louboutin and – because Retromark wouldn’t be complete without one – the latest round of theKit Kat saga. 1. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am by MOTP
In other words, the arbitration agreement (paragraph 10) does not depend on the validity of the contract of which it is a part and would not be rendered moot if a breach-of-contract cause of action were barred by section 82.065(a). [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
    KIT KAT is back as the Advocate General gives his two fingerstwo centsNestlé v Mondelez v EUIPO Joined Cases C‑84/17 P, C‑85/17 P and C‑95/17 P (April 2018)In Volume II we reported on Nestlé’s loss of its UK shape mark for the four finger Kit Kat chocolate bar. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
[Disclosure: colleagues at Simmons&Simmons acted on this case].2. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
They've moved away from that more in recent years, but I think largely because the criminal defense bar has pushed back really hard. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am by Hillary Byrnes
This is because the decision bars unduly broad interpretations of Blaine Amendments. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
So, starting now, let my colleagues and me at Simmons & Simmons help you with that every six months. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:42 pm by Patricia Wald
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 577 (2005): “It is fair to say that the United States now stands alone in a world that has turned its face against the juvenile death penalty. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am by Jamie Baker
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The system was attacked as a violation of the separation of church and state in Zelman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
One was whether the Court had jurisdiction to review a collateral state court’s decision not to apply Miller v. [read post]