Search for: "Singer v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2013, 5:08 pm by Jacek Stramski
The Supreme Court granted review of this case to clarify the application of its holding in Singer v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 1:17 pm by Mikhaila Fogel
Jacques Singer-Emery summarized a ruling out of the U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
Juss, The Notion of Complicity in UK Refugee Law Livio Zilli, Ezokola v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:02 am
The case of Grey v Grey, reported in the Telegraph today, highlights the perennial problem of proving whether or not a party is cohabiting. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
  The oral argument thus renewed the mystery of why the Court granted certiorari in the first place--especially after it had denied the petition in Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Unfiltered complaints v. investigated complaints: do client a big favor (and the AG too) by providing input early on. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
And further dispute arose between Sheeran's song 'Photograph' (also written by the first and third claimants; Sheeran and McDaid) and a song called 'Amazing', following which there was a settlement agreement and 35% of the PRS royalties now go to the writers of 'Amazing'.Naturally, the Claimants sought to strike out these allegations, which came before Deputy Master Jefferis on 4 June 2019 on the basis that similar fact evidence is only admissible in civil… [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(See Palazzo v Conforti, 50 NYS2d 706 [Civ Ct, NY County 1944]; Singer v Reising, 154 Misc 239 [Mun Ct, Queens County 1935].) [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(See Palazzo v Conforti, 50 NYS2d 706 [Civ Ct, NY County 1944]; Singer v Reising, 154 Misc 239 [Mun Ct, Queens County 1935].) [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:39 am by Jon Gelman
State of Florida (or as the Third District referred to it "Padgett v. [?] [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 6:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even under the doctrine of continuous representation, and giving plaintiff the benefit of every possible inference, the relationship between the parties ended, and the limitations period began to run, on August 23, 2016 (see Marzario, 178 AD3d at 528; Riley v Segan, Nemerov & Singer, P.C., 82 AD3d 572, 572-573 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]