Search for: "Smith v. Dept. of Rev." Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
June 20, 2000) (noting that “question of intent is a classic jury question and not one for experts”); Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Maine Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Maine Smith v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
For the latter reason, the applicants argue that the Order is not neutral and generally applicable for purposes of Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
Co., 49 A.D.2d 250 (4th Dept. 1974) (distinguishing manufacturing and design defects, and pe [read post]