Search for: "Smith v. Landmark Communications, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2013, 9:39 am
Owners’ Rights Initiative Applauds Supreme Court Decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:16 am by Anna E. Bullock
The Supreme Court, on June 21, 2021, issued its landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:51 pm by Mark S. Goldstein and Eduardo Vargas
Supreme Court upended affirmative action in higher education admissions in its landmark Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
On the one hand, the argument for the fragility of Sullivan after Bruen is examined in Alexander Hiland & Michael L Smith “Using Bruen to Overturn New York Times v Sullivan” 50 Pepperdine Law Review (forthcoming) (SSRN). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am by Matt Sundquist
The American Constitution Society interviewed Paul Smith, counsel for the plaintiffs in the landmark Court case Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
” Specifically, it was stipulated among parties that Smith’s websites would express and communicate ideas, primarily those that “celebrate and promote the couple’s wedding and unique love story” and those that “celebrat[e] and promot[e]” what Smith understands to be marriage. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:33 am by admin
  These conditions were tested in the Texas judicial system with the case of Inwood North Homeowners’ Association Inc. v Charlie Harris, Jr., et al. and Rolando M. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:35 am by Bexis
  We rated the decision that the Texas Supreme Court just reversed, Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 11:08 am by David Greene
Court 430 US 308 (1977), where the information concerns judicial procedures (Landmark Communications, Inc. v. [read post]