Search for: "State of California v. Frito-Lay, Inc."
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 11:24 am
Astley v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:00 pm
And on April 12, 2018, Frito-Lay, Inc., asked a Federal Court in the Northern District of California to approve a class-wide settlement of a 2017 lawsuit based on allegations that Frito-Lay violated the FCRA’s “stand alone” requirement by including additional language in its FCRA disclosure form including, among other things, a statement that “I have been given a standalone consumer notification that a report will be… [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:00 pm
And on April 12, 2018, Frito-Lay, Inc., asked a Federal Court in the Northern District of California to approve a class-wide settlement of a 2017 lawsuit based on allegations that Frito-Lay violated the FCRA’s “stand alone” requirement by including additional language in its FCRA disclosure form including, among other things, a statement that “I have been given a standalone consumer notification that a report will be… [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Frito-Lay, Inc. et al., Case No. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:58 am
Similarly in Waits v Frito-Lay Inc., the US Court of Appeal determined that a radio commercial that imitated the voice of Tom Waits, a famous singer with a very unique voice, amounted to appropriation of publicity rights under California law and false, implied endorsement under federal law. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Dec. 15, 2011); In re Frito-Lay N. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Dec. 15, 2011); In re Frito-Lay N. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
Frito-Lay, Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
In re Frito-Lay North America, Inc. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:10 am
Frito-Lay North America, Inc., 2013 WL 1320468 (N.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
Frito-Lay North America, Inc., 2013 U.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:05 pm
Frito-Lay N. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Going further, the Court announced its intention to appoint its own damages experts to testify at trial, stating: Judge Alsup relied on the authority of Monolithic Power Sys. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:00 am
Frito-Lay, Inc., 978 F.2d 1093, 1096 (9th Cir. 1992) [read post]