Search for: "State v. Ani"
Results 41 - 60
of 134,628
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:39 am
La Rosa v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The effect, if any, to be given to an earlier arbitration award in subsequent arbitration proceedings is a matter for determination in that forum" (Matter of City School Dist. of City of Tonawanda v Tonawanda Educ. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The effect, if any, to be given to an earlier arbitration award in subsequent arbitration proceedings is a matter for determination in that forum" (Matter of City School Dist. of City of Tonawanda v Tonawanda Educ. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
ACD disputed any advantage conferred by the overlap, and argued that in any event MI’s system still confers the benefit of using two probes rather than one and therefore infringed. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:04 am
It had eight depots spread throughout the State. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:01 pm
In the landmark case of Yick Wo v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 12:38 pm
Related Cases: Google v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am
If by “worse experience” DOJ means how the user experiences access to data and functionality the term doesn’t make any sense. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:14 am
Div. 2009) 4 Adams v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:45 am
The case is Jamie Allen Harless v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
