Search for: "State v. Chestnut"
Results 161 - 180
of 241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 12:00 pm
” Richardson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 12:00 pm
” Richardson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:51 am
Moreover, the city and its amici contend that the court has already determined that § 542(a) permits creditors to remain in possession of debtors’ property notwithstanding § 362 in the bankruptcy chestnut United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 7:06 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 2:19 pm
” Id., at p. 8-9 (citing Estate of Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:32 pm
As the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts noted in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
In re Chestnut Energy Partners, Inc., 300 S.W.3d 386, 397 (Tex. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:27 am
Summary of Decision issued March 5, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Powder River Basin Resource Council v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 10:19 am
Similarly, in Board of Managers of Chestnut Hills Condominium Ass'n. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:44 am
Many old chestnuts of 1A law are attacks on infrastructure: CIO v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
As the U.S. game opened, the German dominance evoked memories of the pithy law-school brief for the contracts chestnut Hadley v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
The case of Ridgeway v Pfizer, Inc., No. 09-2794 (E.D. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:50 am
The lawyers in Elouise Cobell v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
In Karlo v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:44 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:25 pm
Although the First Circuit acknowledged that the defendants did not raise the safe harbor provision in the trial court or explicitly argue it on appeal, it explained that the settled law of the circuit is that “’an appellate court has discretion, in an exceptional case, to reach virgin issues’” (citing Chestnut v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm
But it has been understated insofar as it has referred, to paraphrase the old chestnut from Skidmore v. [read post]
