Search for: "State v. Doherty"
Results 41 - 60
of 227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 2:40 pm
., v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
See, for example, the Rules of the State Civil Service Commission at 4 NYCRR 4.5(d). [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application of M) (FC)… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:55 am
Sanitation worker reinstated as AWOL status due to arrest, acquittal is not misconductSilberzweig v Doherty, ___Misc.3d___Source: Adjunct Law Prof Blog; [lawprofessors.typepad.com]Reproduced with permission. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Jones-Doherty, Morally Regulatable Lives: Corporate Sovereignty, the Rise of Burwell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:22 am
” Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
Doherty, Mr. [read post]
18 May 2014, 10:30 am
In Doherty v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 10:30 am
In Doherty v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:29 am
” – Professor Daniel Tanovich @dtanovich In R v S. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:10 pm
Supreme Court's observation in State Farm v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:33 pm
Supreme Court's statement in State Farm v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
Third, amidst the usual welter of authorities being discussed, it was particularly interesting to see the Irish cases (Donegan v Dublin CC [2008] IEHC 288; Dublin CC v Gallagher [2008] IEHC 354) being drawn on in this context, although they are a bit of a sideshow. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 8:06 am
The court went on to reject Doherty’s reliance on the Northern District of Illinois opinion in EEOC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
United States The trial to determine the damages owed to writer, E Jean Carroll by Donald Trump is set to begin on Tuesday 16 January 2024 in New York. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Details of the mechanism of the alleged fraud can be found in the Opinions of Lord Tyre, [2015] CSOH 150, and Lord Doherty, [2016] CSOH 107. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
