Search for: "State v. Ewing" Results 101 - 120 of 301
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that although “[n]ew justices usually take years to find their footing at the Supreme Court,” “[f]or Justice Neil M. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:09 pm by Karen Ainslie
The Constitutional Court (CC) in SA Revenue Service v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation & Arbitration & others ((2017) 38 ILJ 97 (CC)) has affirmed that use of such language has no place in our constitutional democracy, stating that the word “was meant to visit the worst kind of verbal abuse ever, on another person. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[Federalist Society podcast with Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Supreme Court case of Packingham v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 9:29 pm by Sme
Utah State Charter School Board (10th Cir., December 16, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the Board because its members were entitled to qualified immunity)Discrimination/Retaliation*Jackson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am by David Cheifetz
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union 2016 EWHC 2768 (Admin) see http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2016/2768.pdf A spokesperson from the Crown – or UK gov’t – or the Tory party, pick your poison, announced, as one might expect, that the decision will be appealed. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Ewing, The Structural Articulation of 'Equal Dignity', (August 28, 2016).From SmartCILP:Zachary Bray, RLUIPA and the Limits of Religious Institutionalism, (2016 Utah Law Review 41-103).Julia L. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm by Giles Peaker
Nicholas v Secretary of State for Defence [2015] EWHC 4064 (Ch) (24 August 2015) Rose J. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Ewing v Crown Court sitting at Cardiff and Newport ([2016] EWHC 183 (Admin)) confirms an important feature of the open justice principle: that permission is not needed in order to take notes in Court. [read post]