Search for: "State v. Hansard"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm
As Lord Wakeham noted during the debates on the Bill in 1998, section 32 “enshrines the pre-eminence of freedom of expression” (Hansard, HL, 2 Feb 1998). [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 11:15 am
”); see United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:19 pm
Finally, it is worth reflecting on the illuminating heading of the debate in Hansard : Domestic Violence Victims: Cross-Examination. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:54 am
Reg. 4685 (Jan. 21, 2009). [6] See Burka v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm
I am thinking here of Spencer v Taylor (which we analysed here), Charalambous v Ng, and now Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:19 am
Idle-O Apartments v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 am
In reaching this view, Mr Justice Knowles referred to Hansard – admissible in these proceedings given the ambiguity of the primary legislation – which recorded that during a debate in the House of Lords on 24 October 2000, Lord Falconer of Thoroton stated that the words “or dignity” were proposed to be added to paragraph 3(b) by amendment to ensure “that the exemption applies to the granting of peerages”. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 7:21 am
In this week’s case (Franzman v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
[4] Guerin v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:20 am
In last week’s case (Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:07 am
Gideon v. [read post]
Hanging By A Thread: Reportage and Clause 4 of the Defamation Bill – Sophie Walker and Jason Bosland
11 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
(Hansard, Column 196, February 5, 2013.). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 3:43 am
The RPT specifically stated that they “found no reason to limit the repayment orders to less than the full amount”.P appealed. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 3:43 am
The RPT specifically stated that they “found no reason to limit the repayment orders to less than the full amount”.P appealed. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
The Hansard report from 22 March is here. [read post]
