Search for: "State v. Jamieson" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 8:20 am by Eugene Volokh
The article is here; the Introduction: As articulated by Justice Brandeis in Whitney v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 12:41 pm by Georgialee Lang
  The appeal court upheld the order for retroactive spousal support and the costs award, finding that it was permissible to set off compensation against costs, citing Jamieson v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
The Home Office rejected the request, stating that it is not in the public interest to disclose any of the requested information. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am by Peter Mahler
Common-Law Dissolution Plaintiff Loses Fight Over Venue Last year I wrote about a federal court’s first-impression decision in Busher v Barry in which it applied the Burford abstention doctrine to dismiss, without prejudice to refiling in state court, the minority shareholders’ claim for common-law dissolution. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
So, the President fired him, according to The Huffington Post’s Dave Jamieson. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 4:22 pm
– Joint 2nd Prize Winner of the Essay Competition 2020 Florence Humblet & Kabir Duggal, If You Are Not Part of the Solution, You Are the Problem: Article 37 of the EU Charter as a Defence for Climate Change and Environmental Measures in Investor-State Arbitrations – Joint 2nd Prize Winner Essay competition 2020 Cees Verburg, The Hague Court of Appeal Reinstates the Yukos Awards Bianca McDonnell, Theodoros Adamakopoulos and Others v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
But, fortunately, Dave Jamieson at Huffington Post, with whom I discussed this yesterday, has you covered here. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
 After 1997, when the IRS adopted check-the-box regulations cementing pass-through partnership tax treatment for LLCs, New York and other states flipped the default rule, i.e., members are no longer permitted to withdraw unless authorized by the operating agreement. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A stipulation which stated that the statute of limitations would not be asserted failed to stop the assertion of the statute of limitations in Dineen v Pratt  2017 NY Slip Op 07590  Decided on November 1, 2017  Appellate Division, Second Department the first half of which we reported on yesterday. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
The decision, Jamieson Laboratories Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by NATASHA NGUYEN
The post Case Comment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]