Search for: "State v. Lilly" Results 241 - 260 of 920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm by nedaj
Advisers registered in other states should consult with legal counsel about those states’ custody requirements. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 Claire referred to the HGS v Lilly [2011] UKSC 51 and Actavis v Lilly [2015] EWHC 3294 (Pat) cases as examples of patents which did not have data in them and yet were found to be plausible. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am by John Collins
The judge held that the “undue burden” concept in English law (particularly as outlined by Arnold J in Eli Lilly v Janssen in 2014) was not particularly helpful under Australian law. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 7:41 am by Sarah M Donnelly
Links: Sunday’s article by Lilly Fowler, earlier post with briefs Excerpt: The location where the cases are litigated will prove crucial. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Similarly, Justice de Montigny considered the file history in Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:52 am
This judgment [Hospira UK Ltd v Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC [2016] EWHC 1285 (Pat) (10 June 2016)] was handed down a little while ago, but this Kat only recently got round to studying it properly, containing as it does decisions relating to three rather different patents. [read post]