Search for: "State v. MacE" Results 21 - 40 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2020, 7:33 am by John Rubin
PJC counts as conviction under statute defining conviction as including adjudication of guilt Mace v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 10:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Mace is, in fact, legal in all 50 states, and the Court sees no reason why mace would not also be constitutionally protected.] [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am by Peter Mahler
They also argued that the complaint’s allegations of oppressive conduct by the siblings, while relevant under the statute governing judicial dissolution of a closely held corporation, have no application under § 702 as per cases such as Doyle v Icon and Matter of Kassab. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
Which is why last summer’s decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department in Mace v Tunick was such an eye opener. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:03 am by Peter Mahler
This year’s list includes seven noteworthy appellate decisions, two of which — Mace v Tunick and Shapiro v Ettenson — are poised to have major impact on future operating agreements and business divorce cases involving LLCs. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 4:29 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Harkening back to the same court’s holding two months earlier in Mace v Tunick, 153 AD 689, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 (2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017), written about here, the court noted that the stated purpose of the LLC was “to purchase and sell residential and commercial real estate,” yet there was no allegation in the petition that the management of the LLC was unwilling or unable to achieve this purpose. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In late 2013, WPR, on behalf of its client NCO, filed suits in Illinois state court seeking repayment of student debt owed by Marquez, Garriga, and Russell. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Chancery Court Summarily Orders Dissolution of Deadlocked LLC GR US Licensing, LP v Seibel, Mem. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Chancery Court Summarily Orders Dissolution of Deadlocked LLC GR US Licensing, LP v Seibel, Mem. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Divisions said that this argument was unavailing in light of his disciplinary history, citing Gomez v Kelly, 55 AD3d 305, reversed 12 NY3d 883 [Gomez I].In Gomez I the Appellate Division said that substantial evidence supported the findings that Gomez violated [1] his commanding officer's order to terminate his involvement in a criminal investigation; [2] failed to take possession of drugs during a police department integrity test; [3] failed to voucher his helmet,… [read post]