Search for: "State v. Macy"
Results 61 - 80
of 196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2020, 4:00 pm
[v] Id. at *2 (quoting Flores v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 3:39 pm
Following Macy, on September 25, 2014, the EEOC filed two separate lawsuits—EEOC v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:55 am
In People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
As you may recall in 2012, the EEOC in Macy v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:53 pm
White and State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
Macy v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:37 am
The decision, in Pineda v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:46 am
When Macy initially filed her complaint with the EEOC, it rejected her claim and stated that anti-transgender discrimination was not covered by Title VII. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:16 am
Summary of Decision issued February 23, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Schmidt v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 3:51 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 3:52 pm
In 2012, it similarly found in Macy v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:20 pm
In Macy v Holder, the commission addressed a purely jurisdictional question, finding that a transgender male-to-female federal applicant’s complaint of discrimination because she is transgender could be processed under EEOC procedures. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 11:57 am
Facts: This case (Hawley v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:31 pm
By Gregg Fisch, Rebecca Hirschklau, and James Hays In what is reported to be a landmark decision, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), in Macy v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:10 pm
Garrett's cell phone "the police found text messages discussing the sale of a $300 Macy’s gift card for cash or drugs. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm
Macy's. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:59 pm
The EEOC has been creative in attempting to find protection in the absence of an enacted ENDA in protecting gender identity, change of sex and/or transgender status when it determined in Macy v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
As stated in Playboy Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
