Search for: "State v. Meisel"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2018, 7:49 pm
Sandoz Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2017-1575, 12 October 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:30 pm
Cisco Systems, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2017-1525, 09 November 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 5:28 pm
Bard, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:14 pm
Irex Corp., United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, No. 17-30660, 17 October 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 12:30 am
Baker Hughes Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2018-1141, 18 October 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
Additionally, there are issues of fact as to whether defendants were discharged for cause (see Brill & Meisel v Brown, 113 AD3d 435,436 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Attorney General Reference Nos 1 & 6 of 2008 [2008] EWCA Crim 677 (04 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Whitehead v Searle [2008] EWCA Civ B1 (temporary reference) (04 April 2008) Gopakumar v General Medical Council [2008] EWCA Civ 309 (09 April 2008) Monro v HM Revenue & Customs [2008] EWCA Civ 306 (09 April 2008) Othman (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ… [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:01 am
Arbitrator finds employee guilty of disciplinary charges filed against him; offers employer a choice of penalties to be imposedMatter of Hansen v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 59 AD3d 903NYS Correction Officer Ronald Hansen was served with two notices of discipline. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 4:12 am
Arbitrator finds employee guilty of disciplinary charges filed against him; offers employer a choice of penalties to be imposedMatter of Hansen v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 2009 NY Slip Op 01384, decided on February 26, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentNYS Correction Officer Ronald Hansen was served with two notices of discipline. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:55 am
Meisel v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:06 am
Ilarion TomarovThe Ukrainian Supreme Court in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Aurobindo Pharma Limited has recently introduce a bold approach to applying interim injunctions in disputes between originators and generics over the registration of patented pharmaceuticals. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:17 am
See Brill & Meisel v Brown, 113 AD3d 435, 436 (1st Dept 2014). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:09 am
From this perspective, the recent Teva v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Edward Tracy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 6:33 am
” Cole, Schotz, Bernstein, Meisel & Forman, P.A. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm
Affinia Group, 2016‐Ohio‐2830, ¶ 37, 54 N.E.3d 174, 182; In reJames Wilson Assoc., 965 F.2d 160, 173 (7th Cir.1992); United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:33 am
” “That is the situation that was recently addressed by the Supreme Court of New Jersey in Meisels v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 8:28 am
Brian CorderyBy Nicholas Round On 10 October 2018 the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the matter of Icescape Limited v Ice-World International BV & Ors*. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
Wolff; Donald V. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:57 am
Eszter SzakácsCo-author: Zsolt Lengyel, Danubia Patent and Law Office Just a few months before the CJEU’s judgment in C-121/17 Teva UK Ltd and Others v Gilead Sciences Inc. came out a the Metropolitan Court of Budapest handed down a decision regarding Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp’s (MSD) application for an SPC re the combination of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin. [read post]
