Search for: "State v. Nicholson" Results 41 - 60 of 233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2019, 7:35 am by John McFarland
Veterans Land Bd. of State, 352 S.W.3d 479 (Tex. 2011), and KCM Financial LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:18 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Missing evidence A jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County convicted Marcus Antoine Nicholson, the appellant, of one count of robbery and one count of second-degree assault. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.16 After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm by Chris Attig
Nicholson, that the presumption of exposure to Agent Orange extended to Blue Water Navy veterans. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
(Related to literature on basing damages on R&D costs, which I review here.)Nicholson Price – The novelty requirement is not always aligned with social welfare, as illustrated by the biomedical field. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Events The State of Tobacco Control in Ireland with a focus on Trademarks, 2:00pm to 4:00pm on Tuesday 12 June 2018 in the Neill Lecture Theatre in the Trinity Long Room Hub Arts & Humanities Research Institute, Trinity College Dublin Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Eustice v Channel Seven [2008] SASC 73 Nicholson J dismissed an application for further particulars of a justification defence. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am by INFORRM
  There could be no action under the Equalities Act 2010 since, although ‘belief’ is a protected characteristic, discrimination against an objectionable political belief does not count (see Grainger Plc v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360, [28]). [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 12:45 pm by Aimee Hess
These concepts were discussed by the Texas Supreme Court in Lesley v. [read post]