Search for: "State v. Null"
Results 141 - 160
of 617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court dismissed Local 371's petition which action was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.The Appellate Division explained that Local 371 "failed to establish" that DCAS's inclusion of 20 ungraded research questions in an examination administered for the position of Associate Fraud Investigator violated the merit and fitness mandate set out in Article V, §6 of the New York State Constitution or §50(1) of the New York State… [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court dismissed Local 371's petition which action was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.The Appellate Division explained that Local 371 "failed to establish" that DCAS's inclusion of 20 ungraded research questions in an examination administered for the position of Associate Fraud Investigator violated the merit and fitness mandate set out in Article V, §6 of the New York State Constitution or §50(1) of the New York State… [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court dismissed Local 371's petition which action was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.The Appellate Division explained that Local 371 "failed to establish" that DCAS's inclusion of 20 ungraded research questions in an examination administered for the position of Associate Fraud Investigator violated the merit and fitness mandate set out in Article V, §6 of the New York State Constitution or §50(1) of the New York State… [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
Furthermore, the CPVO has a broad discretion to declare a plant variety right null and void under Article 20 of the Basic Regulation, which it exercises on the basis of the evidence submitted to it by the applicant for a declaration of nullity (see Brookfield New Zealand and Elaris v CPVO and Schniga C-534/10 P). [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:45 pm
It further argues that actions by an agency that is structured unconstitutionally, as distinguished from “defects in a particular officer’s title,” are null and cannot be ratified. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 11:51 am
Supreme Court granted cert on this very question in Summers v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
Mr O’Neill stresses that this government is ‘erosive of the constitution’. 1556: Lady Hale asks Mr O’Neill QC what is the difference between a declaration that an order is null and void and an order for reduction. 1555: Aidan O’Neill QC is questioned by the court regarding a possible amendment to the written pleadings of the Scottish action. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:25 pm
” Hines v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:46 am
Specifically, in Axion RMS v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:46 am
Specifically, in Axion RMS v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 6:16 am
Lucas, Matthew V. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
” Berni v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
The null hypothesis is the opposite of the scientific hypothesis. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:02 pm
Cobleskill Stone Products, Inc. v. [read post]
