Search for: "State v. Pancake"
Results 1 - 20
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 12:10 pm
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Robbery On November 5, 2003, a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted appellant, Everette Keeton, of numerous crimes in connection with the armed robbery of an International House of Pancakes in Marlow Heights, Maryland. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:13 am
International House of Pancakes, Inc., 487 F. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 8:20 am
According to its website, there are nearly 1,500 IHOP restaurants located in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:31 pm
On September 3, 2010, IHOP IP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, the owner of various IHOP registered trademarks in the United States, sued the International House of Prayer alleging various trademark infringement theories. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:13 am
In the case of McDonald v Rappaport et al, Judge Tauro of the United States District Court of Massachusetts, found that the International House of Pancakes is not a fast food restaurant. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:42 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in Cheeks v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:54 am
On August 7, 2015, in Dorain Cheeks v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 11:36 am
In Cheeks v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 1:47 pm
March 24, 2016) the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has confirmed the significance of last year’s Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Cheeks v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:09 am
Freeport Pancake House, Inc. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Some proposed settlement agreements may require court or agency approval Cheeks v Freeport Pancake House, Inc., USCA, 2ndCircuit, Docket 14-299 CVDorian Cheeks sued Freeport Pancake House [FPH] seeking to recover overtime wages, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees under both the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act [FLSA] and New York State’s Labor Law. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:59 pm
More on the Supreme Court's 1986 ruling, Ford v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:52 am
One of the other topics of our discussion was the Cheeks v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 8:48 am
In rejecting the plaintiffs’ argument that reliance need not be shown to certify a class under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, the Southern District not only distinguished a seemingly contrary Florida state court decision, but explicitly stated that the court is not bound by that decision.In Pop’s Pancakes, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:38 am
"Oh, and don't be thinking that it's the pancakes that made 'em do it. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
The court held that Cheeks v. [read post]
