Search for: "State v. Purdie" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2019, 7:30 am by Bill Purdy
Then much hemming and hawing ensued with citations to Dixie Dairies Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:15 pm by Jeffrey Brown
The United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals held in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 3:32 pm
The full case report can be found here: Purdy, R (on the application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions & Anor [2008] EWHC 2565 (QB) (29 October 2008).Abramovich case fails because he is not a UK resident or domicile. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 3:32 pm
The full case report can be found here: Purdy, R (on the application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions & Anor [2008] EWHC 2565 (QB) (29 October 2008).Abramovich case fails because he is not a UK resident or domicile. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Judge Purdy rejected this challenge, stating that he could 'find no tenable basis for holding a fair trial, with all appropriate trial safeguards, cannot take place in the instant case'. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm by Leslie Sammis
State, 74 So. 3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).The same issue raised in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
Lincoln’s Trident: The West Gulf Blockading Squadron during the Civil War; William Davenport Mercer’s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:45 am by Matt Bouchard
  Seattle public procurement consultant Mike Purdy tweeted about how the still-unresolved partial shutdown of the federal government (really? [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 12:20 am by Rosalind English
Further analysis of “M” States Not Obliged to Assist Persons Wishing to Commit Suicide – Antoine Buyse GMC to announce policy of striking off doctors who prolong the lives of terminally ill patients against their wishes [updated] Previous posts on the Pretty and Purdy cases Filed under: In the news [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Purdy v Public Adm'r of the County of Westchester, 72 NY2d at 9 - "[the patient] could come and go as she pleased"). [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]