Search for: "State v. Rutherford" Results 101 - 120 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions  Australia In the case of Kingsfield Holdings v Rutherford ([2016] WASC 117) Kenneth Martin J dismissed a slander claim in respect of 15 words published to one person. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am by Eleanor Mitchell, Matrix
The decision below: Rutherford and A Following the Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, the claimants in Rutherford and A were (necessarily) at pains to show that their position was more closely analogous to Burnip v Birmingham City Council than to MA. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am by Eleanor Mitchell, Matrix
The Supreme Court will spend the first half of this week hearing the appeals in three related cases: R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
Rutherford & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2016] EWCA Civ 29 The Court of Appeal tackles the bedroom tax and discrimination again, and, a year on from MA & Ors, there is quite a difference. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Mark Rumold
  A federal district judge in Maryland dismissed Wikimedia v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by Jon Gelman
This memo will has obvious added consequences to state interpretation to this issue. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Specifically, it’s the section quoted below, partially because it applies the rule cited above; but, also because I’m a 13-year-old trapped in a 39-year-old employment lawyer’s body: In Rutherford Food Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm by Giles Peaker
Hardy, R (on the application of) v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2015] EWHC 890 Oh, we have been waiting for this one. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm by sgottlieb
[1] Brief of the Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae in Support of the Petitioner, Heien v. [read post]