Search for: "State v. Scientific Coating Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
See, e.g., Merck & Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:47 am
Writes Liptak, The case on commercial speech, Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
The first sale doctrine was first endorsed in the Supreme Court case of Bobbs-Merrill Co v Straus (1908) where the Court held that "The purchase of a book, once sold by authority of the owner of the copyright, may sell it again, although he could not publish a new edition of it. . . . [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
Why did Scientific American change its mind to broaden the construction of its claim? [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Why did Scientific American change its mind to broaden the construction of its claim? [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 9:27 am
Wonderland Music Co., 241 F. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:51 pm
National Lead Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
Human Rights Watch spoke to the co-founder of the intelligence software company that spotted the breach. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:28 pm
Thus far, the only claim to reach the courts was brought by David Zindel, son of the Pulitzer prize winner Paul Zindel.Zindel v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
The same ‘white lab coat’ problem − that the jury will not be able to figure out the expert’s missteps − would seem to apply equally to basis, methodology and application. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:57 pm
See Star Scientific, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Court Denies Plaintiff’s Fallback Request for Meet and Confer after Quashing its Subpoena: In Boston Scientific Corporation v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
" Boston Scientific (BSC) v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:24 pm
See Procter & Gamble Co. v Teva Pharms. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
He represented Boston Scientific Corp. in litigation over patents for drug-coated stents. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
The argument states that “Justice Harry Anstead noted the “open issue” in a 2007 (Marsh v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
See, e.g., Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
United States Cellular Corporation (N.D. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:27 am
Hisley v. [read post]
