Search for: "State v. Sharkey"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2024, 5:29 pm
While the Court of Appeal in John v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v Campbell (2003): The Misguided Legacy of ProportionalityCatherine M Sharkey (New York University, USA)14. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Prince, Penn State Dickinson Law ERISA plan fiduciaries must be permitted to consider ESG factors when selecting plan investments. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
Sharkey and Jeffrey Edward Green. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) lcb11@psu.edu Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s latest foray into this area is Merck v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:19 am
Barbara Munroe-Diamond, Sally Sharkey, James P. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:15 am
The record in the case, E.D. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 2:57 pm
” Sharkey v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
In addition to regulating behavior during armed conflict, Protocols II and V, specifically, require parties to a conflict to take specific measures post-conflict to reduce the dangers posed by mines, booby traps, and other forms of unexploded and abandoned ordnance. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
” Laws and court opinions do not just resolve concrete issues; they provide moral guidance.For example, Brown v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
This fall we had a conference at Case Western to explore these issues further, and we were fortunate enough to be joined by Catherine Sharkey, Suzette Malveaux, Karen Harned, Brianne Gorod and my colleague Cassandra Robertson. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:59 am
Last year, in Michigan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 4:44 am
First, States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:48 am
It dives into the history of the 1909 Copyright Act and the resulting Herbert v Shanley Co. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
The launch of the OMLN marked a quantum leap in the breadth and impact of the CMLP's services, placing individual online media clients in contact with skilled media and business attorneys throughout the United States willing to provide legal services on a pro bono or reduced fee basis. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
The launch of the OMLN marked a quantum leap in the breadth and impact of the CMLP's services, placing individual online media clients in contact with skilled media and business attorneys throughout the United States willing to provide legal services on a pro bono or reduced fee basis. [read post]
