Search for: "State v. Stark" Results 161 - 180 of 1,763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:50 pm by LTA-Editor
Duncan Stark Blog Editor   On Monday, the Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision in the Fourth Amendment case Unites States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:14 am by Andrew Trask
The plaintiffs appealed, and the Sixth Circuit took the case: Schlaud v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:49 am by Shahram Miri
This is probably most famously, or infamously depending upon your political persuasion, stated in  the United States Supreme court case Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:46 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
  Commil is the Court’s third recent foray into this terrain.The first was Global-Tech v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:21 pm
 A stark contrast to the fairly brief period of probation you're likely to receive in state court if you slash its tires or (maybe) even if you steal it and drive it into a lake.And your conviction and sentence will be affirmed by the Ninth Circuit.Briefly put, there's pretty much no possible way to fill in the blank in the following sentence with something that makes sense:  "It's a nice day today. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Law.com emphasized the lawyers rather than the substance.Scott Graham of Law.com on the Stark decision in Idenix/Merck v. [read post]
But even here, the stark reality is that some public schools across the state are still using abstinence-only programs. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
The opinion stated, "Get a license or do not sample. [read post]