Search for: "Sterling v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 662
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2018, 1:02 pm
See Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:41 am
The March 16, 2018 decision in Fichera v New York State Dep’t of Envtl. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 3:01 pm
Interestingly, though, Nitze clerked for Justice Sotomayor during the 2012 Supreme Court term, when the court decided U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 7:11 am
Post-Och Telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:49 pm
In State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Circuit sitting en banc in 1979 on the political question issue in Goldwater v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:33 am
ESMA also stated that it would conduct a brief consultation in January 2018. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 6:14 am
Current President Donald Trump is now part of the case, called Smith v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:52 pm
The parties stated that they would advise the Court before May 31, 2018 whether a settlement has been approved. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:52 pm
The parties stated that they would advise the Court before May 31, 2018 whether a settlement has been approved. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:47 am
Apr. 15, 1982); Sterling Drug Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:48 pm
Among other things, Duncan was counsel of record in Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 1:01 am
I thought I was in the wrong state. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:56 pm
Park Sterling Corporation, et al.; No. 3:17-cv-00483 (W.D.N.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 5:33 pm
[1] Most of this commentary was thoughtful, e.g., Debbie Sterling, “An Open Le [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 11:12 am
In so holding, the Second Circuit noted that in Jock v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 11:12 am
In so holding, the Second Circuit noted that in Jock v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:05 pm
The Supreme Court stated in Sandifer v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
The tax, which is 24 times the state excise tax rate on beer, has received mixed reviews among constituents. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:42 am
The three-judge panel in Jock v. [read post]
