Search for: "Strand v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 2:34 pm
In February, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the lower court decision in Davis, et. al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:17 am
Blog posts & press:"EU Court Rules Three Member States Broke Law over Refugee Quotas," The Guardian, 2 April 2020 [text]- See also related legal summary on EDAL.A Hole of Unclear Dimensions: Reading ND and NT v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Bus. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
Amanda Frost, “By Accident of Birth”: The Battle over Birthright Citizenship After United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:55 am
The outcome of Mintz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm
" (Polymer Tech Corp v Mimran (1992)). [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
(v) Expressions of concern about constitutionalism are often used as a ‘mask’ (p. 35) to conceal political disagreement with populist movements. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:25 pm
Per Judge Marcus, concurring in Community State Bank v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:32 pm
Per Judge Marcus, concurring, in Community State Bank v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:40 am
Davis-Miller v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 7:53 am
by Dennis Crouch Amgen v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:54 am
Gore, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
The court also considered the specific strand of authority concerning legally privileged documents disclosed by mistake, sometimes called the Ashburton v Pape jurisdiction (after Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469). [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 8:38 am
Problem 11 --State of Missouri v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
" Excerpt:The "free lunch" refers to the once-common tradition of saloons in the United States providing a "free" lunch to patrons who had purchased at least one drink. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:23 am
” Affirming this holding, the Court of Appeals ruled, “We agree that article 9 of the corporation’s by-laws is void as an absolute restraint on the power of alienation violative of the public policy in this State” (Quinn v Stuart Lakes Club, Inc., 57 NY2d 1003 [1982]). [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 9:04 am
In Caminiti v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 2:44 pm
Et Al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
