Search for: "Supervisor #1 alleged, & #2" Results 41 - 60 of 2,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Town Supervisor admitted many of the factual allegations set out in Becallo’s petition, including his claim that [1] she had a romantic relationship with an employee of the engineering firm [employee] that was hired by the Town and [2] that she signed the contract with the engineering firm and approved invoices for work completed by the employee and [3] that she had used campaign funds to pay for a bulk mailing of a Town newsletter to senior citizens. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm by Ilyse Schuman
The Seventh Circuit agreed with the lower court that the employee was able to establish that her work environment “(1) was both objectively and subjectively offensive; (2) that the harassment was based on her race; and (3) that the conduct was either severe or pervasive. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
After several months of leave, Sutter advised Higgins-Williams that it would terminate her, unless she provided information as to (1) when she could return to work and (2) whether additional leave as an accommodation would effectuate her return to work. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:52 am
Dep’t. of Treasury, Appeal No. 0120090364 (2012), a telephone operator for the Department of Treasury filed an EEO complaint alleging she had been subjected to retaliation when: 1) her shift leader yelled at her regarding a business call and issued her a letter of reprimand; 2) she was not selected for a promotion; and 3) her manager spoke negatively about her and disclosed confidential information about the complainant’s prior EEO activity to a coworker. [read post]
Under newly-added Section 21.141 of the Texas Labor Code, an employer commits an “unlawful employment practice” if “sexual harassment of an employee occurs and the employer or employer’s agents or supervisors: (1) know or should have known that the conduct constituting sexual harassment was occurring; and (2) fail to take immediate and appropriate corrective action” (emphasis added). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:51 am by Sheppard Mullin
Many California employers have been sued in class actions based on alleged misclassification. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:30 am
Judge Addison recommended dismissal of two charges [1] that the individual intimidated a co-worker by staring through her office window and [2] that he failed to evacuate the building as directed by building security, finding the proof insufficient to establish guilt of the misconduct alleged. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm by Robin E. Shea
The only way that an employer escapes strict liability for supervisor harassment is when (1) the harassment results in no tangible job detriment, and (2) the employer can show that (a) it exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct harassment (such as an effective no-harassment policy, training, and complaint and investigation procedures) and (b) the plaintiff unreasonably failed to avail herself of those remedial measures or otherwise take steps to avoid harm. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:37 am by Adam Weinstein
  Recently, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) imposed sanctions against Herman Mannings (Mannings), a JP Turner supervisor, concerning allegations that from February 2009, through October 2011, Mannings failed to reasonably supervise the activities of a registered representative to prevent unsuitable mutual fund switching. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 10:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Judge Casey, however, dismissed the allegation charging that Smith had made disrespectful comments to a supervisor. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:45 am by P.K. Runkles-Pearson
The juicy allegations involve (1) the principal’s affair with the wife of another principal in the same school district, (2) the principal’s complaint that another district employee was “stalking” him after he “rebuffed her advances,” and (3) yet another employee’s allegation that she was dating the principal when he slept with yet another employee. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 8:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
 Looking at this issue anew, the First Department holds in a 3-2 vote that "in order to hold an individual owner or officer of a corporate employer, in addition to the separately charged corporate employer, strictly liable under section 8-107(13)(b)(1) of the Administrative Code, a plaintiff must allege that the individual has an ownership interest or has the power to do more than carry out personnel decisions made by others and must allege that the… [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:21 am by Richard Renner
S. 1, ___ (2010) (slip op., at 9) (internal quotation marks omitted).2  We do not think that the ultimate decisionmaker’s exercise of judgment automatically renders the link to the supervisor’s bias "remote" or "purely contingent. [read post]