Search for: "Taylor v. Employment Division" Results 1 - 20 of 335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2010, 3:48 am
Collective bargaining after the Taylor Law Agreement expiresLocal 2562 v PERB, App. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
’" Citing Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y., Inc., 14 NY3d 46, the Appellate Division held that "the presumption is that all terms and conditions of employment are subject to mandatory bargaining. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
Arbitrating a grievance after the Taylor Law contract expiresUniformed Fire Fighters Assoc. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Union rather than officers or board members to acknowledge it does not assert the right to violate the Taylor LawNew York City Tr. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:52 am
Vindicating an employee's right conferred by law may not be resolved by filing a grievance pursuant to a collective bargaining agreementMarino v Hauppauge UFSD, 262 AD2d 321If a public employee claims that some action by his or her employer violated his or her statutory rights, may the employer insist that the issue be resolved by the employee filing a grievance under a Taylor Law contract grievance procedure? [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 12:18 pm
Employee to be paid for estimated lost overtime following the employer's violation of a Taylor Law agreement's overtime rotation provisionMatter of Town of Wallkill v Town of Wallkill Police Benevolent Assn., 2008 NY Slip Op 08497, decided on November 5, 2008, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Town Police Chief placed a Town police officer on modified duty. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
For the purposes of Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the Taylor Law, the term "public employee" means any person holding a position by appointment or employment in the service of a public employer except:[1] judges and justices of the unified court system;[2] persons holding positions by appointment or employment in the organized militia of the state; and [3] persons who may reasonably be designated from time to time as managerial or… [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
For the purposes of Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the Taylor Law, the term "public employee" means any person holding a position by appointment or employment in the service of a public employer except:[1] judges and justices of the unified court system;[2] persons holding positions by appointment or employment in the organized militia of the state; and [3] persons who may reasonably be designated from time to time as managerial or… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:10 am
No right to discovery in a disciplinary procedure unless provided by law or specifically provided by the collective bargaining agreementMatter of Pfau v Public Employment Relations Board, 2010 NY Slip Op 00340, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) determined that the Unified Court System (UCS) engaged in an improper practice under the Taylor Law (Civil [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:11 am
Litigating the Taylor Law in federal courtSchermerhorn v Metropolitan Trans. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Taylor Law requires all public employers and employee organizations to negotiate in good faith to determine the terms and conditions of employment of employees in the negotiating unit. 2. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Taylor Law requires all public employers and employee organizations to negotiate in good faith to determine the terms and conditions of employment of employees in the negotiating unit. 2. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
The Appellate Division said that the first issue to be resolved when determining whether a dispute is subject to public sector employment arbitration is "whether the subject of the claim sought to be arbitrated is the type authorized by the Taylor Law” citing Matter of Blackburne, 87 NY2d 660. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:23 am
Individuals performing services for a public employer may be designated "non-employees" by statute Levitt v NYC Office of Collective Bargaining, 273 AD2d 104For the purposes of collective bargaining Article 14 of the Civil Service Law -- the Taylor Law -- applies to all individuals in the services of a public employer except judges, individuals in the military service and public employees designated managerial or confidential. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:41 am
" Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
Jurisdiction to resolve an impasse in collective bargaining under the Taylor LawPolice Benevolent Association v City of New York, 285 A.D.2d 52 In a unanimous ruling, the Appellate Division, Third Department, held that the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB] has exclusive jurisdiction insofar as resolving Taylor Law impasse situations are concerned. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The State Constitution’s prohibition of gifts of public funds is not necessarily applicable in situations involving labor-management relations between public employees and public employers under the Taylor Law2015 NY Slip Op 03837, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIntroducing its decision in this appeal with the statement "Judicial review of an arbitrator's award is extremely limited," the Appellate Division explained that "A party… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Taylor Law considerations concerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a/207-cBarnes v Council 82, [David Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719Watertown v Watertown PBA, Court of Appeals, 95 NY2d 73Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO, v Cohoes, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686The Court of Appeals has handed down three rulings concerning issues involving collective bargaining under the Taylor Law as they relate to negotiating procedures to implement and administer… [read post]