Search for: "Taylor v. State and Univ." Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2016, 3:06 am
The Taylor case is the jewel in the crown of the SCSL, as it was the first ever trial and conviction of a former African head of state for crimes committed in a neighboring state. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Challenging an employee's termination during his or her disciplinary probation periodWoods v State Univ. of N.Y., 2017 NY Slip Op 03083, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn 2013 a member of a collective bargaining unit [Employee] represented by the New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association, Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
., Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of The Constitutional Rights and Interests Of Children in Support of Respondents in Masterpiece Cakeshop LTD, et al v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Imposing a "disciplinary probation period" as part of the penalty or settlement of a disciplinary actionWoods v State Univ. of N.Y., 2016 NY Slip Op 04084, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe genesis of Woods v State University of New York [SUNY], was Norman Woods being served with a notice of discipline issued in accordance with the terms of the collective bargaining agreement [CBA] negotiated by State and Woods’ collective… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
June 20, 2000) (same); Taylor v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The March 2010 issue of American United's Church & State has recently appeared online.Recent Books:Dan Diner, Lost in the Sacred: Why the Muslim World Stood Still, (Princeton Univ. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
Univ., No. 1:11-CV-00977-TWP-DKL, 2011 WL 4068453 (S.D. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Veden, Univ of Arkansas, Fayetteville: The Alchemy and Antirrhetic of West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am by Sean Wajert
Schimke, 718 P.2d 635 (Kan. 1986); Taylor v. [read post]