Search for: "Texas v. United States Department of Labor"
Results 61 - 80
of 391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm
Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act - Class II Gaming)United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm
Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act - Class II Gaming)United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm
Recognized in Who’s Who In American Professionals and both an American Bar Association (ABA) and a State Bar of Texas Fellow, Ms. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Dept. of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v Thomas E. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:22 am
The DOL updated the rule in light of the landmark United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:27 am
United States Department of Labor, No. 4:16-cv-00731 (E.D. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 3:45 pm
David v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 11:05 am
In addition, the plaintiffs in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
TEXAS SUPREME COURT PER CURIM OPINION IN COMPANION CASE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ------------ NO. 13-0576 ------------ THE WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P., PETITIONER, v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:51 am
The methodology used to calculates the prevailing wages the Labor Department requires employer to pay H-2B workers and United States (U.S.) workers recruited in connection with a temporary labor certification for use in petitioning the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to employ a nonimmigrant worker in H-2B status will change effective January 1, 2012. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:10 pm
Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:03 am
” The policy at the center of the case, United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 10:57 am
In its complaint, Texas argues that United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Today the Supreme Court announced that it was deadlocked four to four on United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
In its ruling in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
One of the most important changes came through the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am
By a 3-2 vote on a major case, the Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board (ARB) has limited the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) whistleblower protection outside the boundaries of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:20 pm
Nassar to cases brought under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 and to require plaintiffs asserting claims for interference and retaliation in violation of that statute to prove but-for causation rather than the motivating factor causation; (2) whether the regulations of the United States Department of Labor providing for a mixed motive or motivating factor standard to apply to claims brought under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 are entitled… [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 10:43 am
United States Department of Labor et al (filed by 21 state attorney generals). [read post]
