Search for: "Thompson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm
Thompson (Indian Country Determination; Criminal Jurisdiction) Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
And thus the conflict--on the one hand it is of vital importance to continue the development of a viable transnational tort law of business and human rights. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am
Medicare Exclusion Risks: Employing Excluded Individuals Can Result in Significant Administrative, Civil and / or Criminal Liabilities (May 8, 2023): One of the most severe administrative sanctions available under the Social Security Act stems from the authority of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)[1] to “exclude” individuals and entities from participating in Federal… [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:40 am
Attorney General Merrick Garland has threatened to sue states that have outlawed or restricted abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm
Sandra Eskin Deputy Under Secretary for Food Safety Food Safety and Inspection Service 331-E Jamie Whitten Federal Bldg. 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20250 Docket Clerk U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:15 pm
Sandra Eskin Deputy Under Secretary for Food Safety Food Safety and Inspection Service 331-E Jamie Whitten Federal Bldg. 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20250 Docket Clerk U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
On 30 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court gave judgment in three cases relating ([2019] UKSC 3) concerning the disclosure of minor criminal convictions on standard or enchanced Disclosure and Barring service checks. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:04 am
(i) Those who can’t afford coverage; (ii) taxpayers below the poverty line; (iii) members of Indian tribes; (iv) individuals experiencing “short coverage gaps” in health insurance; and (v) persons who’ve received a “hardship” exemption from the Secretary of Health and Human Services. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
A freelance reporter and photographer had been sent by the newspaper to cover the service. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Supreme Court held in Thompson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Thompson, 11-305, in light of last week’s decision in Greene v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
Lord Hope also indicated that he would have considered the potential for an appeal to the Upper Tribunal curative of any breach of Article 6, following Albert and Le Compte v Belgium (1983) 5 EHRR 533, para 29; Tehrani v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting [2001] IRLR 208; R (Thompson) v Law Society [2004] 1 WLR 2522 There is one curiosity in the reasoning of Lord Dyson in that he seeks to dismiss concerns that the… [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
If you are interested in specialist courts, see Adam Wagner’s post from September on mental health courts. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
Jay also founded Prefix, LLC, which helps lawyers and clients value and price legal services. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
Jay also founded Prefix, LLC, which helps lawyers and clients value and price legal services. [read post]
