Search for: "Tiffany v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held on Wednesday that to convict a defendant of impeding the administration of the tax code, the government must prove that the defendant knew of or could have foreseen a tax-related proceeding. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:16 am by David Markus
And that omission, Stuart contended, was inconsistent with Bullcoming v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:38 am by admin
A federal judge in New York May 23 ordered the Bank of China to freeze the assets of alleged counterfeiters in China and to turn over information on credit card transactions involving those firms (Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
For example, in Tiffany v eBay, Tiffany & Co. sued eBay after filing thousands of take-down notices with eBay for counterfeit jewelry products, claiming that eBay had knowledge of sellers infringing Tiffany’s mark yet continued allowing infringing sellers on their website. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the scope of tribal fishing rights, comes from Miriam Seifter. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then continued to assess the evidence, and concluded that the shape of the KitKat chocolate bar had acquired distinctive character through use in Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, but that the Board of Appeal could not validly conclude its examination of the distinctive character acquired by the contested trade mark throughout the European Union on the basis of the percentage of the public recognising that… [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Unknown
United States, demonstrates what not to do when it is time to sign an amended tax return. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a case about whether property owners are entitled to a jury when the federal government takes their land,” arguing that “[a] jury is key when it comes to compensation questions because the government has an obvious conflict of interest in appraising ‘fair’ market value. [read post]