Search for: "Toledo v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
Rostholder v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:55 am
Civil forfeiture complaints are governed by the Supplemental Rules in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which state in part that the Government must ”state sufficiently detailed facts to support a reasonable belief that the government will be able to meet its burden of proof at trial. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:22 pm
Id. at 46 (citing Toledo v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
Humphreys School of LawMichael Campbell, Villanova University Charles Widger School of LawErin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of LawCynthia Ho, Loyola University of Chicago School of LawDanielle Pelfrey Duryea, University of Buffalo School of Law, State University of New YorkJennifer Mantel, University of Houston Law CenterElizabeth McCuskey, University of Toledo College of LawLaura McNally-Levine, Case Western Reserve University School of LawJennifer Oliva,… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
Page Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0138p.062008/04/03 USA v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
United States, 220 F. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Toledo-Cardona, 14-163. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:02 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Cty Findlay Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0084n.06 Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
Génesis Seguros Generales Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros (GENESIS) v Boys Toys S.A., Administración del Estado (Class 46) Montes de Toledo PDO amended (Class 46) Arbitration ruling on the transfer of the PUMA trade marks in Spain (Class 46) (Property, intangible) Switzerland ALTEC LANSING is heard (Class 46) Tanzania Interim injunctive relief in Tanzania (Afro-IP) Thailand First Thai agricultural product on its way to get PGI status (Class 46) Ukraine… [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:12 pm
See Thoughts on United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Kappos (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court E D Texas: A bridge too far: Following jury verdict of infringement and invalidity defendant failed to show inequitable conduct by clear and convincing evidence: Mettler-Toledo, Inc v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm
This was an appeal from the United States District Court for theMiddle District of Florida in No. 3:11-cv-00819-TJC-JRK,Judge Timothy J. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
The first time, it was a death penalty case. a death penalty case, State v. [read post]
