Search for: "U.S. v. Alan Cohen"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
Among the first and most persuasive to make the case was former U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 580-581 (1994). [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
But in a series of decisions, culminating in Kelly v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 11:57 am
District Court judge authorizing the use of a geofence warrant in the Jan. 6 prosecution case United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:52 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm
, Best v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100, 106 (2009) (citing Cohen v. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
See Cohen v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Anderson, and Alan Rozenshtein to talk through U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Cohen and Gian Gentile discussed what the U.S. military learned from its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and how these lessons might impact its approach to conventional warfare, such as the war in Ukraine. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm
Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm
Joel Cohen and Alan Wolff, began meeting with the lawyers to identify areas of expertise needed by the court, and what the process of court-appointment of neutral expert witnesses would look like. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 5:48 am
Christiana Wayne shared the Supreme Court’s ruling in Van Buren v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
App. 4th Dist. 2008) Cohen v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
App. 4th Dist. 2008) Cohen v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
By Alan T. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
