Search for: "US Steel Corp. v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
United States Steel Corp., ___ U.S. ___ (1/27/14), the Supreme Court of the United States considered the meaning of the phrase "changing clothes" in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 29 U.S.C. section 201 et seq. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
  For a copy of the Court of Appeals' decision, please use this link: Wilson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:23 am by Greg Mersol
United States Steel Corp., Case No. 12-417 (Jan. 27, 2014), addressing donning and doffing claims in the context of a unionized steel mill. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
The employer was the Bethlehem Steel Company, at the Bethlehem Steel Sparrows Point Shipyard. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 10:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Metro-North Commuter R.R., 92 F.3d, 117, 126 (2d Cir. 1996) (awarding front pay for over 20 years); Bethlehem Steel Corp., 958 F.2d at 1189 (2d Cir. 1992) (awarding front pay for a 17-year period).Saber v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am by Peter J. Dugan
United States Steel Corp., which clarified what it means for an employee to be “changing clothes” under Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]