Search for: "US v. Al Smith" Results 101 - 120 of 935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2008, 7:44 am
Quick conversation with Jonathan Pink, partner at Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith Minow: Could you tell us about the new decision about the state university professor who was sued for copyright infringement? [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:15 pm
The American Civil Liberties Union represents al-Kidd in the case, al-Kidd v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:19 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Maatman, Jr. and David Ross This morning the Supreme Court issued its long awaited and much anticipated ruling in Smith, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm
Challenge to Morgan Insider Policy Falters on Grounds of Conflict Preemption, BNA Broker/Dealer Compliance Report, June 1, 2011 Marcia Bloemendaal, et al v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:34 am
  Roberts et al. came down with one decision, Pearson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:52 am by Jon Gelman
Smith Water Products Company, et al 2016 WL 1589917 Decided 4/20/16Limited time access at: http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a3967-14.pdf [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:03 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Scott Smith has this story in the Stockton Record.The Ninth Circuit today rejected the attack on Arizona's lethal injection protocol in Dickens v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Guidelines used to determine if an entity is a “public body that is performing a governmental function” for the purposes of the Open Meetings LawThomas, et al. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 06989, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Department of Education [DOE] appealed an order and judgment handed down by Supreme Court, New York County, granting a petition filed by Michael P. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am by Emily Coward
See, e.g., Jerry Kang, et al., Implicit Bias in the Courtroom, Jerry Kang et al., 9 UCLA L. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, the parties correctly concede that this appeal is moot (see Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce v Pataki, 100 NY2d 801, 810-811 [2003], cert denied 540 US 1017 [2003]). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, the parties correctly concede that this appeal is moot (see Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce v Pataki, 100 NY2d 801, 810-811 [2003], cert denied 540 US 1017 [2003]). [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 8:23 am
Priscilla Smith(Priscilla Smith represented Dr. [read post]