Search for: "US v. David Miller" Results 1 - 20 of 687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 2:52 am by Frank Cranmer
Background In Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022, the claimant was appointed Professor of Political Sociology at the University from 1 September 2018. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
The co-defendant in the federal case was “Miller’s Organic Farm,” the name Miller uses on websites, Facebook, and at other locations. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Lapsley with: unimpeded access to the meat-and-poultry-related records and facilities of (i) Miller’s Organic Farm; (ii) Amos Miller Organic Farm; (iii) Amos Miller; and (iv) the agents, employees, workers, associates, and assigns of Miller’s Organic Farm, Amos Miller Organic Farm, and Amos Miller; Such unimpeded access shall extend to facilities and records used for any meat-and-poultry-related purpose (including but not… [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Miller represented to Joe Stocker of First Bank that the David E. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 3:12 pm
 The US Supreme Court also issued Buck v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:45 pm by Patricia Salkin
Defendants, David Miller and Donald Miller, were qualified medical marijuana patients along with defendant, Katherine Null, who served as David’s registered medical marijuana primary caregiver. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
Part V addresses Miller and Tucker's claim that the American Founders were unfamiliar with dramatic technological changes in firearms — a claim that is refuted by Dupuy's data. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:42 am by SHG
Rather, David Prater means what he says. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm by INFORRM
Riley v Murray, then, sits uncomfortably with the Court of Appeal’s decision in Miller v College of Policing [2021] EWCA Civ 1926,  which was handed down on the same day. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:36 pm
Shapiro -- during the course of his representation of white-collar fraudster David Liang. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:44 pm by Jeffrey Brown
" Despite no facts in the case involving the use of a camera, but he did use a web cam to communicate with children. [read post]