Search for: "US v. Kennedy Covington"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2010, 5:09 am
Yesterday, the US Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the Michigan Supreme Court was right in holding that Covington’s statements were inadmissible because they were testimonial under Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:13 pm
In Michigan v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:56 am
In Davis v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 10:55 am
Owens, 352 F.3d 842, 847 (4th Cir. 2003); Covington v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:38 am
You thought they meant it in Crawford v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 8:16 am
On Wednesday, November 29, the Court heard argument in Watters v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:49 am
Covington. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
Covington, 16-649, and – wait, we already did this one – North Carolina v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Michigan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
Ghassan Haj-Hamed Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
The Supreme Court majority in McCutcheon v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
At times the authors rail at the use of statistical significance as the “sole” criterion, and at times, they seem to criticize its use at all. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
Clark v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Covington, “was clear: injunctions are governed by equitable principles, in voting rights law just as elsewhere,” and that a footnote in another opinion, in Kokesh v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Don’t believe us, or even Wikipedia, here’s the link to Time Magazine’s 2013 “chargemaster” cover article that discussed medical billing and price inflation. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
Judgment was reserved. .United States There has been widespread reporting of Thomas J’s concurring opinion [pdf] in the case of McKee v Cosby to the effect that the US Supreme Court should reconsider New York Times v Sullivan. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
In an opinion by Sotomayor (for herself, Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, and Alito), the Court explains that Covington's statements weren't testimonial because there was this ongoing emergency the police were concerned about and that was the "primary purpose" of the questioning. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In a high profile disqualification dispute, Covington & Burling was disqualified in the case of State of Minnesota v. 3M. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
China China has published Draft Regulations on the Classified Protection of Cybersecurity for public comment, a move which has been noted by Hunton Andrews Kurth and Covington & Burling. [read post]
