Search for: "US v. Richard Royal"
Results 41 - 60
of 222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2012, 4:11 am
Yesterday, courtesy of Cat the Kat, we brought you the "no holds Bard" drama of Royal Shakespeare v Royal Shakespeare (here), in which the Royal Shakespeare Company succeeded in obtaining the cancellation of a Community trade mark for the words ROYAL SHAKESPEARE which was obtained by an enterprising Austrian company called Jackson in respect of (inter alia) beers and other alcoholic beverages. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am
Marines what Patrick O’Brian did for the Royal Navy. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 8:23 am
Price v Filtcraft', Rose also reports on the Price v Filtcraft decision on what happens if the infringement continues after a court orders an injunction. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:18 am
| When the movie drives the book (wait a minute, there is no movie yet) | The Royal Wedding and Intellectual Property Rights... [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
The royal prerogative was created and exists for the purpose of giving effect to the referendum. 15.55 On the AV referendum, Eadie QC says that this needed provisions in legislation to work out what the consequences would be following the vote. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
Richard Grime, a Partner with O’Melveny & Myers and Practice Center Contributor, sent in this article that he wrote along with Katherine Buchanan entitled Implications of the U.K. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
| Richard Meade QC appointed to the High Court The Global Innovation Index (GII) 2020 has been released [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:24 am
The first introductory symposium was published here by Chukwuma Samuel Adesina Okoli and Richard Frimpong Oppong, and second symposium was published by Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 8:32 am
The latest news from Marine Technologies v Burchill (see earlier posts here, here and here) is that the IPKat fielded a phone call from the Royal Courts of Justice earlier this afternoon from Mr Burchill. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
” At The New Republic, Matt Ford looks at the cert petition in Royal v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:05 am
” At Law.com, Marcia Coyle reports that in a “rare, ‘uninvited’” amicus brief asking the Supreme Court to grant cert in Royal v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that in Royal v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:28 am
”); see also Richard A. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
At times the authors rail at the use of statistical significance as the “sole” criterion, and at times, they seem to criticize its use at all. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
The ICO has published a statement in response to the publication of the Royal Free audit report. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
Rex v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
(T 1003/19) | Richard Arnold to be sworn in as Lord Justice of Appeal on Thursday | [Guest Post] IP and AI - the debate continues, this time at WIPO | [Guest Post] IP in the global automotive industry: IP seminar at Volvo cars - day 1 | Book Review: Robot Rules, Regulating Artificial Intelligence | [BREAKING] A-G Tanchev finds lack of intention to use a trade mark can be indicative of bad faith & insufficiently clear and precise registrations may be contrary to public policy |… [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
This decision followed the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Hamilton International Ltd v. [read post]
