Search for: "United States Supreme Court, any and all Judicial Officers thereof"
Results 61 - 80
of 301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:34 am
Here is what it says: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Part III will explain why the United States Supreme Court is likely to hold that the taking in Kelo does not violate the federal Constitution – thereby continuing to reserve the power in the states to make such determinations. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Civil officers, their subordinates and agents, ofall branches, departments, and subdivisions of thegovernments of the States of United States under theamendment to the U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
There does not appear to be settled judicial precedent on this question (certainly Stephen Jones doesn’t cite any). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:33 am
SEC. 2 And be it further enacted, That any person who shall hereafter knowingly accept or hold any office under the United States, or any State, to which he is ineligible under the third section of the fourteenth article of amendment of the Constitution of the United States, or who shall attempt to hold or exercise the duties of any such… [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:30 am
Second is the Necessary and Proper Clause, which vests Congress with the power “[t]o make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall when they stated “the Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court, and that the judges thereof cannot confer on any reporter any such right. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:49 am
The United States currently has more than 35 national emergencies in force—all triggering the broad IEEPA sanctions authorities. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:53 am
What makes it easy, and what purportedly justifies it, is how the Supremes have dealt with the provision of Article III of the Constitution (specifically, the first paragraph of Section 2 of Article III) that sets out the jurisdiction of the federal courts.The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their… [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
See also United States v. [read post]
Of Insurrections, Presidents, and the Utter Failure of Constitutional Law to Address the Real Issues
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Section 3 says the following:No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial… [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
As the court stated, the status of the conflict would in turn inform any analysis of the legality of the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
Supreme Court, which tends to be remarkably stingy about both human rights and national powers to promote the general welfare. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
All things considered, Griffin’s Case lies in the heartland of judicial thinking and scholarship. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm
§101, of course, states that patents are available for "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof[.] [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
It states: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial… [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:35 pm
"The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that police officers are public officials. [read post]
