Search for: "United States v. 20 CASES, ETC." Results 81 - 100 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by David Kopel
The first post-Heller case to examine an age limit for the Second Amendment was the First Circuit's United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:16 am by Tana Fye
”[28]  In line with this position, the United States Supreme Court, with three dissenters, reversed the judgment of the Supreme Court of Mississippi and remanded the case. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
So far, this could be the start of a fairy tale in which the artist comes to NY, works hard, triumphs, etc. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
So far, this could be the start of a fairy tale in which the artist comes to NY, works hard, triumphs,  etc. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
So far, this could be the start of a fairy tale in which the artist comes to NY, works hard, triumphs, etc. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am by Florian Mueller
Howard: "Being completely non-technical it relates to the same invention, but the fact that it relates to the same invention does not lead to the conclusion that the patent of that invention in the United Kingdom and the United States and Germany and China is valid. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, argued next on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of petitioner. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:37 pm by Sara Hutchins Jodka
Aug 20, 2013), which we reported on here, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey held that private Facebook posts are protected under the Stored Communications Act. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:03 am by David DePaolo
State of Florida.In the meantime, the Florida Supreme Court has another, similar, matter pending before it called Hector v. [read post]