Search for: "United States v. 302 Cases" Results 141 - 160 of 431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
(Vikram has previously criticised over-reliance on Australian cases in this regard. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:15 am
But Chambers does not go so far as to hold that a defendant is denied a fair opportunity to defend himself whenever a state rule  excludes favorable evidence, see United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:19 am by SHG
The stated criteria often clash and not all apply in every case, but they demand individuated considerations: No one size fits all. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
  The court then began its analysis of the issues in this case, explaining thatFather argues the family court's order is unconstitutional in that it infringes on his right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and Section 8 of the Kentucky Constitution. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Shapiro, 302 F.Supp. 761, 764 (D.C.Conn.1969), appeal dismissed, 396 U.S. 488, 90 S.Ct. 641, 24 L.Ed.2d 677; Holloway v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Shapiro, 302 F.Supp. 761, 764 (D.C.Conn.1969), appeal dismissed, 396 U.S. 488, 90 S.Ct. 641, 24 L.Ed.2d 677; Holloway v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
In relevant part, § 1442(a)(1) provides that `[a] civil action . . . that is commenced in a State court’ may be removed to federal court if the action is against `any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States . . . for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:44 pm by Sarah Atkinson
” A qualified investment entity includes any REIT and certain regulated investment companies (“RICs”) that are or are deemed to be United States real property holding corporations (“USRPHCs”). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
” In The Atlantic, Lawrence Norden discusses the Court and its campaign finance cases, concluding that “it is no exaggeration to say that the next appointments to the Supreme Court will have a profound impact on political power in the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
Sanchez Valle, describing it as an “explosive” filing that “has inexplicably undermined nearly 70 years of the United States’ legal and political commitment about the status of Puerto Rico and the right of the people there to local self-government. [read post]